Freedom for the farmers

The Maharashtra government’s decision to promulgate an ordinance this week to exempt farmers from having to mandatorily sell their fruit and vegetable crop atmandis governed by a 1963 law on marketing farm produce, is a bold and laudable step. That Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has stood his ground against the powerful lobby of middlemen, who shut shop in protest, is even more commendable. The problem with the present regime, under which produce has to be sold through Agricultural Produce Market Committees, is that farmers seldom benefit from price movements; traders rake in the upside that consumers are forced to shell out. When onion prices soar, for instance, it is usually traceable to APMC mandis in Nashik. This reform could help check household food expenditure by cutting out high intermediary costs to an extent. But an even more critical objective is to make Indian agriculture a sustainable economic activity. Maharashtra’s move is pertinent as acute indebtedness among farmers in the State has become almost systemic over the past decade. If the Central government wants to double farmers’ incomes in five years (not an easy task even over a decade, going by official data from 2003 to 2013), several interventions are necessary, including better irrigation facilities, and the freedom to sell output where farmers get the best price. Fruits and vegetables are a good place to start dismantling monopolies of the sort that Indian industry was freed from 25 years ago. Despite a substantially lower acreage than crops such as cereals and pulses, they contribute a quarter of farm sector incomes. Estimates vary, but there is no denying that a significant chunk of horticultural produce just rots. That wouldn’t be the case if farmers could sell easily to food processing units, or even directly to consumers via e-commerce channels.

Breaking the stranglehold of APMCs must be accompanied with easier access to credit and market information services, for which farmers often rely on their captive buyers; there also needs to be a greater push for cooperative groups so that marginal and small farmers have adequate negotiating heft in a free market. Healthy competition among private traders and processing units, government procurement agencies and cooperative farmer-producer groups would improve price discovery from farm to fork. Going ahead, Maharashtra and other States also need to back the Centre’s ambitious plan unveiled this April to create an e-National Agriculture Market for 25 major crops. BJP-ruled or not, States must wrestle with vested interests and create more choices for the farmer and the consumer. Though seven States had already implemented the Centre’s June 2014 advisory to allow farmers to sell their horticultural produce anywhere instead of through APMCs, Maharashtra’s initiative is crucial as it has a larger agrarian economy with a greater impact on national food market dynamics.

Important Words

1> Promulgate -- promote or make widely known (an idea or cause)

2> Ordinance -- An official order

3> regime -- present ruling government

4> seldom -- rarely

5> pertinent -- relevant

6> Indebtedness -- state of owning something (useful money)

7> monopoly -- the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade

8> acreage -- area of land typically when used for agricultural purposes

9> chunk -- thick or solid piece of something

10> rot -- decay or cause to decay by the action of bacteria and fungi.

11> stranglehold -- complete or overwhelming control

12> accompany -- escort -- go somewhere with (someone)

13> captive -- a person who has been taken prisoner or an animal that has been confined.

14> heft -- lift or carry

15> unveil -- show or announce publicly

16> wrestle -- take part in fight

17> agrarian -- relating to cultivated land

18> exempt -- free from an obligation or liability imposed on others

19> farm to fork --used to refer to the various processes in the food chain from agricultural production to consumption